Sanhedrin Daf 50 - Order of Severity of Misos Beis Din
Summary
- The sugya establishes the relative severity of the four capital punishments and presents a fundamental dispute: the Chachamim rank them as *sekilah, s'reifah, sayif, chenek*, while Rabbi Shimon ranks them as *s'reifah, sekilah, chenek, sayif*. The Gemara marshals proofs for the Chachamim’s order—primarily from offenses of *megadef* and *oved avodah zarah* as acts of *poshet yado ba'ikar*, from distinctions between an *arusah* and a *nesu'ah*, from the status of a bat kohen who is *mezaneh*, and from Ir Hanidachat with the measure of “memonam avad,” alongside a gezerah shavah of “aviyah–aviyah.” The sugya then reconstructs Rabbi Shimon’s order by showing that an *arusah* bat kohen receives *s'reifah* and by deriving that for him *chenek* is more severe than *sayif*, which in turn yields *s'reifah* above both. The discussion applies these hierarchies to cases such as a bat kohen *arusah* who is *mezaneh* with her father and explores nafka minot like a person liable to two *mitot*, together with analyses by the Ran, the Raavad, the Ri’az, the Noda BiYehuda, the Minchas Chinuch, the Mordechai, the Magen Avraham, Rabbeinu Yonah, Tosafot, and later Acharonim. The daf concludes by introducing a beraita that yields six dinim concerning a bat kohen who is *mezaneh*, to be elaborated subsequently.
- The Gemara states that *sekilah* is more severe than *s'reifah* because it is assigned to *megadef* and *oved avodah zarah*, who are characterized as *poshet yado ba'ikar*. The counterclaim that *s'reifah* is more severe due to a bat kohen who is *mezaneh* being *mechallel beit aviyah* is rejected by the Chachamim, who hold that an *arusah* bat kohen does not receive *s'reifah* but rather *sekilah*, indicating that *sekilah* is the most severe when no harsher punishment exists to “upgrade” her beyond an *arusah* bat Yisrael.
- The Ran explains that since the honor of parents is equated with the honor of Heaven, the bat kohen’s *chillul* of her father is a direct affront to Heaven and conceptually parallels *poshet yado ba'ikar*, justifying the initial intuition that *s'reifah* might be the most severe. The Raavad argues that the point of “*mechallel beit aviyah*” is not to outweigh *poshet yado ba'ikar*, but to show that an *arusah* bat kohen is doing worse than an *arusah* bat Yisrael, which would have implied “upgrading” her—yet the Chachamim still rule *sekilah*, confirming *sekilah* as more severe.
- The Noda BiYehuda (Mahadura Kama, Yoreh De’ah 69) rules that a groom may void a shidduch after the bride’s father apostatizes, even if he had accepted the father’s prior nonobservance, because apostasy is a different and far worse act. His proof comes from the sugya: a bat kohen who is *mezaneh*—though it is “from among the severe offenses” due to *mechallel beit aviyah*—receives *s'reifah*, while *megadef* and *oved avodah zarah*—as *poshet yado ba'ikar*—receive *sekilah*, showing that the latter is graver.
- The Gemara establishes *sekilah* over *sayif* by the same logic of *megadef* and *oved avodah zarah*, despite the counterclaim that *sayif* is severe because in Ir Hanidachat “memonam avad.” The Gemara asserts that the worse power is the *madich*, who receives *sekilah*, and the Ri’az explains that the *madich* himself affirms idolatry (“bo’u v’na’avod”) and thus is both a sinner and one who causes others to sin, making his offense worse than the *nidach*. The Gemara places *sekilah* above *chenek* by showing that an *arusah* bat Yisrael receives *sekilah* while a *nesu'ah* bat Yisrael receives *chenek*, and the Minchas Chinuch frames the parent-honor offenses as kavod Shamayim given that parents are partners with Heaven, yet the explicit Torah contrast between *arusah* and *nesu'ah* determines the ranking.
- The Gemara sets *s'reifah* above *sayif* through a gezerah shavah: the Torah uses “aviyah” in the context of *sekilah* for a *na’arah me’orasah* and also “aviyah” in the context of *s'reifah* for a bat kohen who is *mezaneh*; just as *sekilah* is above *sayif*, so is *s'reifah* above *sayif*. The Mordechai rules that a kohen whose daughter apostasized is treated with secular conduct, leading the Magen Avraham (Orach Chaim 128) to ask why *mechallel beit aviyah* proves *s'reifah*’s severity if avodah zarah also “mechallel” her father; he answers that *znut* constitutes a more direct *chillul* of her father, as underscored by “ra’u gidulim shegidaltem” in Ketubot 45.
- The Gemara derives *s'reifah* over *chenek* from the explicit distinction that a *nesu'ah* bat Yisrael receives *chenek* while a *nesu'ah* bat kohen who is *mezaneh* receives *s'reifah*. The Gemara places *sayif* over *chenek* by noting that even weighed against offenses tied to kavod Shamayim (e.g., *makkeh aviv v’immo*), *poshet yado ba'ikar* remains more severe, so Ir Hanidachat’s category fixed to avodah zarah undergirds *sayif*’s position above *chenek*.
- Rabbi Shimon holds *s'reifah* above *sekilah* because he rules that both an *arusah* and a *nesu'ah* bat kohen who are *mezaneh* receive *s'reifah*, revealing that *s'reifah* is the more severe punishment. Rabbi Shimon sets *s'reifah* above *chenek* by the explicit Torah distinction that a *nesu'ah* bat kohen receives *s'reifah* in contrast to a *nesu'ah* bat Yisrael who receives *chenek*. Rabbi Shimon concludes *s'reifah* over *sayif* via a kal va’chomer once it is established that for him *chenek* is more severe than *sayif*.
- Rashi explains that Rabbi Shimon holds the *madichei* Ir Hanidachat receive *chenek*, while the *nidachim* receive *sayif*, hence *chenek* is more severe than *sayif*. Once *chenek* > *sayif* and *s'reifah* > *chenek*, it follows that *s'reifah* > *sayif*, and after proving *sekilah* > *chenek*, it follows that *sekilah* > *sayif* as well.
- Rabbeinu Yonah asks why the Gemara emphasizes “memonam avad” as the severity of Ir Hanidachat rather than the core idolatry which is *poshet yado ba'ikar*. He answers that idolatry’s core exists in other categories too, so the Gemara highlights the feature uniquely and consistently identifying Ir Hanidachat’s extra severity, namely the destruction of their property.
- Rabbi Yochanan states that an *arusah* bat kohen who is *mezaneh* receives *sekilah* according to the Chachamim and *s'reifah* according to Rabbi Shimon, and if she is *mezaneh* with her father, the Chachamim give *sekilah* while Rabbi Shimon gives *s'reifah*. The Gemara attributes their divergence to the different severity scales, yielding a practical nafka minah in a case of someone liable to two *mitot*, where “nidon ba’hamurah” and kam lei bederabah minei require knowing the ranking to select the severer *mitah*.
- The Sefer Sanhedri Ketana asks how, for the Chachamim, *sekilah* can supplant *s'reifah* in the case of a daughter with her father, given ein issur chal al issur and that the “daughter” prohibition precedes *eshet ish*. He answers that *issur mosif* applies for the Chachamim because *erusin* adds prohibitions to the whole world, allowing the second issur to take effect; for Rabbi Shimon—who holds ein issur chal al issur even with *issur mosif*—one could alternatively ground the result in the earlier *issur* (and its associated *mitah*), rather than invoking comparative severity.
- A beraita states in Rabbi Shimon’s name that “shnei kelalim ne’emru b’bat kohen,” meaning the Torah initially included bat kohen within the general rules for *nesu'ah* and *arusah* and then singled out bat kohen in both to be more stringent with *s'reifah*. The beraita also rules that edei zomemim regarding a *bat kohen* do not receive *s'reifah* but receive the punishment of the man with whom they claimed the act occurred.
- Tosafot (Chullin 11b) rules that when different hayavei *mitot* are mixed, all are judged with the lighter *mitah* even if the majority would have received the severer one, because we do not use rov to switch one *mitah* to another when *mitah* is anyway certain. Acharonim ask how a bat kohen is given *s'reifah* based on “rov be’ilot achar ha’ba’al” when the only uncertainty is which *mitah* applies; they answer that we also rely on the mother’s chazakat kashrut, and that this rov determines the girl’s entire personal status across life (e.g., terumah, kinship prohibitions), not merely which *mitah* to apply, so Tosafot’s limitation does not govern this case.
- The sugya completes the comparative frameworks for the Chachamim and Rabbi Shimon and ties the bat kohen *arusah/nesu'ah* rulings to their respective severity scales. The daf closes by deriving six dinim from the verses about a bat kohen who is *mezaneh*, which are to be explicated further.
Previous Page
Next Page
Daf Images are property of Vagshal and may not be reproduced.
Suggestions