Explanation: Regarding a man, it does not apply to say "his wife's field was flooded", for a man is not the field of his wife, like I explained above (2b).

Explanation (Ri): He divorces her and pays a Kesuvah, even though he divorces her b'Al Korcho (against his will);

This is like a woman who comes due to a claim (that her husband is impotent). In Yevamos (65b), it connotes that he pays a Kesuvah, even though he divorces her b'Al Korcho.

The Tosefta explicitly teaches about the Mumim here that he divorces her and pays a Kesuvah.

Question: If so, every woman will scheme and marry him, so he will give to her a Kesuvah. She will say "I cannot bear", and he will divorce her!

Answer: Perhaps where there is concern for scheming, she has no Kesuvah.

Question: Why don't we answer that Rav Yehudah taught that one who gathers dog excrement is a small tanner? (Maharam Shif - Mekametz in the Mishnah is a small tanner. The latter Beraisa proves that one who gathers dog excrement is not a small tanner, for if so, the two Tana'im do not argue! Hafla'ah - the Mishnah teaches also a big tanner, i.e. he was a small tanner, and after Nisu'in became a big tanner. Rav Yehudah's Beraisa says that even if Mumim arose later, he need not divorce her. R. Shimon ben Gamliel agrees about Mumim before Nisu'in. The Reisha (of Mekametz and Borsi) must be R. Meir, who holds that a Tenai does not help. If so, the same applies even if he remained a small tanner! Therefore, Rav Yehudah cannot say that the Mishnah teaches small and big tanners.)

In Berachos (25a), it connotes that dog excrement is used in tanning leather!

Citation (25a - Beraisa): One may not read Keri'as Shema facing dog excrement or human excrement... when he put hides in them.

Question: The Beraisa in Yevamos (64a) is difficult for him!

Citation (64a - Beraisa): If one married a woman and delayed 10 years with her and she did not give birth, he may not be Batel [from Pru u'Rvu]. He must divorce her and pay a Kesuvah.

Answer: "Yotzi" connotes coercion only in a matter in which he conducts with her improperly;

However, there it taught "Yotzi" due to neglect of Pru u'Rvu. It does not connote coercion.